Affordability, market stability, and consumer protection

Comment Letter on the proposed rule, “Requirements Related to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act”

The Massachusetts Health Connector has voiced strong support for the proposed rule “Requirements Related to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act,” emphasizing the critical need for equal access to mental health and substance use disorder benefits. The proposal comes at a time when the mental health crisis has intensified nationwide and in Massachusetts, with rising rates of psychological distress, substance use disorders, and barriers to care.

Comment Letter on the proposed rule, “Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage; Level-Funded Plan Arrangements; and Tax Treatment of Certain Accident and Health Insurance”

The Massachusetts Health Connector submitted a comment letter in support of proposed changes to regulations surrounding Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance (STLDI) and related coverage options. These updates aim to protect consumers and promote equitable access to comprehensive health care.

Comment Letter on the Draft 2022 Federal Actuarial Value Calculator Methodology

The Massachusetts Health Connector and Division of Insurance have shared key feedback on the draft 2022 Federal Actuarial Value Calculator Methodology. The comment letter emphasizes concerns over how the current methodology affects plan design, particularly for bronze-level plans, which are increasingly difficult to keep affordable and within federal standards.

Comment Letter on the proposed rule, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely”

The Massachusetts Health Connector has raised significant concerns about the proposed SUNSET rule, which could lead to the automatic expiration of vital health regulations if not reviewed in a timely manner. The Health Connector warns that this approach risks creating disruptions in health coverage and unpredictability in the insurance market, potentially harming consumers and states that rely on these protections.

Go to Top